X-ray physics notes curriculum
Fundamentals of radiation
The X-ray machine
Production of X-rays
Interaction of radiation with matter
X-ray detection and image formation
Image quality
Radiation safety in X-ray imaging (current module)
Fluoroscopy
Mammography
The goal of dose reduction is to maintain diagnostic image quality while minimising patient radiation risk.
Most dose-reduction strategies follow the optimisation (ALARA) principle which states, every exposure should deliver the lowest dose reasonably achievable for the required clinical information.
This lesson touches on many different aspects of dose reduction. I’ve tried to keep it concise and focus on strategies that get asked about in exams.
Factors Influencing Patient Dose
Patient dose depends on:
- Exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, filtration).
- Field size and collimation.
- Use of anti-scatter grids.
- Patient size and positioning.
- Equipment calibration and detector efficiency.
Technical Strategies for Dose Reduction
| Parameter / Technique | Principle | Effect on Dose / Image Quality |
|---|---|---|
| High kVp, low mAs technique | Higher energy photons more penetrating; fewer interactions per unit dose | ↓ Dose, ↓ contrast (but acceptable for most exams) |
| Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) | Terminates exposure once optimal detector signal achieved | Ensures consistent detector dose; prevents overexposure |
| Tight collimation | Restricts beam to region of interest | ↓ Scatter, ↓ dose, ↑ contrast |
| Added filtration | Removes low-energy photons that would be absorbed superficially | ↓ Skin dose, minimal effect on image quality |
| Remove anti-scatter grid when not required | Grids increase mAs requirement | ↓ Dose in thin patients (<10 cm) |
| Use of high-DQE detectors | Efficient X-ray-to-signal conversion | Allows dose reduction for same SNR |
| Optimised SID and OID | Larger SID, smaller OID reduce skin dose and geometric blur | ↓ Dose to skin and improves sharpness |
| Appropriate exposure charts | Standardise technique by body part and thickness | Prevents unnecessary repeats and overexposures |
Repeat Exposures
Repeat imaging is a major avoidable source of radiation dose.
Common causes include:
- Poor positioning or collimation.
- Incorrect exposure factors.
- Motion blur.
- Artefacts from clothing, jewellery, or equipment.
Prevention:
- Staff training and standardised protocols.
- Quality control (QC) checks.
- Immediate image review to detect positioning errors before repeating series.
Special Techniques for Dose Reduction
These are factors unique to certain modalities. A little heads up, these are examiners favourites for exams!
| Modality / Context | Method | Explanation / Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy | Pulsed fluoroscopy, last-image hold | Reduces exposure time by 50–80% |
| Mammography | Breast compression | Reduces tissue thickness → lower mAs, ↓ scatter |
| CT (for completeness) | Tube current modulation, iterative reconstruction | Dose reduction up to 40–60% |
| Mobile radiography | Ensure detector flush with patient and aligned to tube | Minimise repeat exposures |
Monitoring and Feedback
Modern X-ray units display Dose–Area Product (DAP) or Exposure Index (EI) values after each exposure.
These allow comparison with Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) to ensure practice remains within acceptable limits.
- DRLs: Set at the 75th percentile of national dose distributions.
- Not dose limits but investigation levels. If doses are above DRL this prompts a review of technique or equipment performance.
Key Takeaways and Exam Tips:
- Dose reduction follows ALARA: minimise dose, maintain diagnostic quality.
- High kVp / low mAs technique is the simplest dose-saving approach.
- Collimation and filtration reduce both dose and scatter..
- Avoid repeats through careful positioning and QC.
- Common exam question: “Describe methods to reduce patient dose in X-ray imaging and their effect on image quality.”