X-ray physics notes curriculum
Fundamentals of radiation
The X-ray machine
Production of X-rays
Interaction of radiation with matter
X-ray detection and image formation
Image quality (current module)
Radiation safety in X-ray imaging
Fluoroscopy
Mammography
An artefact is any feature appearing in an image that does not correspond to the anatomy being examined.
Artefacts can mimic or obscure pathology, reduce diagnostic quality, and interfere with exposure assessment.
Digital systems (CR and DR) have largely eliminated many film-based artefacts but have introduced new ones related to detector technology, data processing, and system calibration.
I’m not going to be able to cover all artefacts here. I have tried to classify artefacts into groups and mention the main artefacts seen in each.
The classification I’ve used is as follows:
| Category | Source | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Detector artefacts | Faults or non-uniformities in the detector | Dead pixels, line defects, ghosting |
| Processing artefacts | Errors in image correction, enhancement, or display | Edge enhancement halos, banding, histogram errors |
| Exposure-related artefacts | Improper exposure or grid alignment | Saturation, noise, moiré pattern |
| Mechanical / environmental | External factors affecting acquisition | Dust on CR plate, cassette damage, RF interference |
Let’s look at each of these in some more detail.
Detector Artefacts
A. Dead or Defective Pixels
- Individual detector elements (DELs) may fail, producing constant bright or dark spots.
- Line artefacts occur when an entire column or row of pixels fails.
- Systems use interpolation from neighbouring pixels to correct single-pixel faults, but large clusters require service calibration.
B. Non-Uniform Response
- Variations in detector gain or scintillator thickness cause brightness non-uniformity (shading).
- Corrected by flat-field calibration (gain and offset maps).
- If calibration data are outdated → residual “mottle” or “pattern” artefacts appear.
C. Ghosting / Lag
- Residual charge or trapped electrons from a previous exposure cause faint “after-images”.
- More common in CR plates or a-Se detectors under high dose or rapid re-exposure conditions.
- Mitigated by plate erasure (CR) or by delaying re-exposure.
Processing Artefacts
A. Edge Enhancement Artefacts
- Occur when high-frequency filters over-emphasise sharp boundaries.
- Appear as bright or dark “halos” along edges of bones or devices.
- Recognised by symmetrical light–dark outlines.
- Can mimic fractures or lines in chest radiographs.
- Reduce by using standard or “soft tissue” processing modes.
B. Banding or Step Artefacts
- Appear as horizontal or vertical bands of varying brightness.
- Caused by readout instability, detector timing errors, or software glitches.
- May also result from partial flat-field calibration failure.
Exposure-Related Artefacts
A. Saturation (Clipping)
- Occurs when detector elements receive exposure above their measurable limit.
- Pixels reach maximum value (white) → loss of anatomical information.
- Common in DR with metallic implants or very high exposure regions.
- Prevent by appropriate technique and using exposure index (EI) feedback.
B. Underexposure
- Too few photons → high quantum noise → image graininess.
- The image may still look acceptable after processing (due to automatic brightness correction), masking the underexposure.
C. Grid-Related Artefacts
- Moiré pattern: interference between the grid line frequency and the CR scanning frequency, producing wavy bands.
- Avoid by using stationary grids with non-parallel orientation or high-frequency grids (>100 lines/inch).
- Grid cutoff: improper alignment or SID causes uneven exposure, most visible at image edges.
D. Double Exposure (CR)
- Failure to erase a plate properly before reuse results in overlapping images.
- Prevent by complete erasure and visual inspection before reloading.
Mechanical and Environmental Artefacts
| Source | Description / Appearance | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| Dust or debris on CR plate | White or dark specks, reproducible location | Regular plate cleaning |
| Damaged cassette or light leaks | Streaks or fogging | Cassette replacement |
| RF interference / electrical noise | Regular line patterns or speckled noise | Equipment shielding |
| Temperature / humidity extremes | Affects phosphor sensitivity | Controlled storage conditions |
Artefacts Unique to CR vs DR
| System | Common Artefacts | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CR | Laser jitter, moiré pattern, ghosting, plate dust | Artefacts arise during readout and erasure stages |
| Indirect DR | Light scatter, pixel dropouts, calibration errors | Caused by scintillator or electronics |
| Direct DR (a-Se) | Lag, dead pixels, saturation | Fewer artefacts overall but more sensitive to static and heat |
Key Takeaways and Exam Tips:
- An artefact is any spurious image feature unrelated to the patient.
- Major categories: detector, processing, exposure, mechanical/environmental.
- Recognising artefacts prevents misdiagnosis and unnecessary repeat exposures.
- Many artefacts mimic pathology e.g. edge halos (fracture mimic).
- Common exam question: “List common artefacts in computed and digital radiography and describe their causes.”
Up Next
Next, we’ll move on to Optimisation of Image Quality and Dose, which ties together all previous concepts.