Artefacts in digital imaging

An artefact is any feature appearing in an image that does not correspond to the anatomy being examined.

Artefacts can mimic or obscure pathology, reduce diagnostic quality, and interfere with exposure assessment.

Digital systems (CR and DR) have largely eliminated many film-based artefacts but have introduced new ones related to detector technology, data processing, and system calibration.

I’m not going to be able to cover all artefacts here. I have tried to classify artefacts into groups and mention the main artefacts seen in each.

The classification I’ve used is as follows:

CategorySourceExamples
Detector artefactsFaults or non-uniformities in the detectorDead pixels, line defects, ghosting
Processing artefactsErrors in image correction, enhancement, or displayEdge enhancement halos, banding, histogram errors
Exposure-related artefactsImproper exposure or grid alignmentSaturation, noise, moiré pattern
Mechanical / environmentalExternal factors affecting acquisitionDust on CR plate, cassette damage, RF interference

Let’s look at each of these in some more detail.

Detector Artefacts
A. Dead or Defective Pixels
  • Individual detector elements (DELs) may fail, producing constant bright or dark spots.
  • Line artefacts occur when an entire column or row of pixels fails.
  • Systems use interpolation from neighbouring pixels to correct single-pixel faults, but large clusters require service calibration.
B. Non-Uniform Response
  • Variations in detector gain or scintillator thickness cause brightness non-uniformity (shading).
  • Corrected by flat-field calibration (gain and offset maps).
  • If calibration data are outdated → residual “mottle” or “pattern” artefacts appear.
C. Ghosting / Lag
  • Residual charge or trapped electrons from a previous exposure cause faint “after-images”.
  • More common in CR plates or a-Se detectors under high dose or rapid re-exposure conditions.
  • Mitigated by plate erasure (CR) or by delaying re-exposure.
Processing Artefacts
A. Edge Enhancement Artefacts
  • Occur when high-frequency filters over-emphasise sharp boundaries.
  • Appear as bright or dark “halos” along edges of bones or devices.
  • Recognised by symmetrical light–dark outlines.
  • Can mimic fractures or lines in chest radiographs.
  • Reduce by using standard or “soft tissue” processing modes.
B. Banding or Step Artefacts
  • Appear as horizontal or vertical bands of varying brightness.
  • Caused by readout instability, detector timing errors, or software glitches.
  • May also result from partial flat-field calibration failure.
Exposure-Related Artefacts
A. Saturation (Clipping)
  • Occurs when detector elements receive exposure above their measurable limit.
  • Pixels reach maximum value (white) → loss of anatomical information.
  • Common in DR with metallic implants or very high exposure regions.
  • Prevent by appropriate technique and using exposure index (EI) feedback.
B. Underexposure
  • Too few photons → high quantum noise → image graininess.
  • The image may still look acceptable after processing (due to automatic brightness correction), masking the underexposure.
C. Grid-Related Artefacts
  • Moiré pattern: interference between the grid line frequency and the CR scanning frequency, producing wavy bands.
  • Avoid by using stationary grids with non-parallel orientation or high-frequency grids (>100 lines/inch).
  • Grid cutoff: improper alignment or SID causes uneven exposure, most visible at image edges.
D. Double Exposure (CR)
  • Failure to erase a plate properly before reuse results in overlapping images.
  • Prevent by complete erasure and visual inspection before reloading.
Mechanical and Environmental Artefacts
SourceDescription / AppearancePrevention
Dust or debris on CR plateWhite or dark specks, reproducible locationRegular plate cleaning
Damaged cassette or light leaksStreaks or foggingCassette replacement
RF interference / electrical noiseRegular line patterns or speckled noiseEquipment shielding
Temperature / humidity extremesAffects phosphor sensitivityControlled storage conditions
Artefacts Unique to CR vs DR
SystemCommon ArtefactsNotes
CRLaser jitter, moiré pattern, ghosting, plate dustArtefacts arise during readout and erasure stages
Indirect DRLight scatter, pixel dropouts, calibration errorsCaused by scintillator or electronics
Direct DR (a-Se)Lag, dead pixels, saturationFewer artefacts overall but more sensitive to static and heat
Key Takeaways and Exam Tips:
  • An artefact is any spurious image feature unrelated to the patient.
  • Major categories: detector, processing, exposure, mechanical/environmental.
  • Recognising artefacts prevents misdiagnosis and unnecessary repeat exposures.
  • Many artefacts mimic pathology e.g. edge halos (fracture mimic).
  • Common exam question: “List common artefacts in computed and digital radiography and describe their causes.”
Up Next

Next, we’ll move on to Optimisation of Image Quality and Dose, which ties together all previous concepts.

Quick navigation

X-ray physics notes: